As a researcher, say in a university or other academic setting, you are excited to share your groundbreaking work with the world. But for inventions with commercial potential, a crucial question arises: should I publish my research first, or file for a patent first? This can be a tricky decision, especially in an academic setting. Let us see what are the differences between disclosing an invention in a publication vis-a-vis patent.

Publications: Disclosing your research in a scientific journal establishes your credibility and allows for peer review. It is crucial for academic recognition and fosters collaboration within the research community. However, publications do not offer legal protection for your invention. Anyone can access, use, or modify your published ideas.

Patents: Patents grant you exclusive rights to prevent others from making, using, selling, or importing your invention for a limited period, usually 20 years, within a specific territory. This protection allows you to control the commercialization of your invention and potentially generate revenue through licensing or selling the patent rights.

The Publish-First Pitfall: While publishing first might seem like the natural course, it can have unintended consequences for patenting your invention later. Most countries have a novelty requirement for patents. This means your invention cannot be publicly known before filing the patent application. Publishing your research can be considered public disclosure, potentially jeopardizing your ability to secure a patent.