The rapid advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have opened doors to groundbreaking inventions, but patenting these innovations presents unique challenges. Unlike traditional inventions with clear human inventors, AI inventions often raise questions about inventorship, novelty, and the nature of the invention itself.
Inventorship: Who is the Inventor?
Patent law traditionally requires a human inventor. However, AI often plays a significant role in the inventive process, raising questions about who should be named as the inventor. Can a machine be an inventor? Currently, most jurisdictions do not recognize AI as an inventor, leaving the burden on human developers or the company behind the AI to be named as the inventor, which can be complex in collaborative projects.
Novelty and Non-Obviousness: Was it truly new and inventive?
AI inventions often rely on vast amounts of data and training, making it difficult to establish true novelty. The question arises: is the invention truly new, or simply a combination of existing techniques? Furthermore, proving that the invention is non-obvious, meaning it would not be obvious to a person skilled in the art, can be challenging due to the complex and often opaque nature of AI algorithms.
Subject Matter Eligibility: Is it patentable at all?
Many jurisdictions, like the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), exclude abstract ideas, laws of nature, and mathematical algorithms from patent protection. Since some AI inventions might be seen as primarily based on mathematical algorithms, convincing patent offices of their patentability can be an uphill battle.
Have more questions ? Answers are a click away!