{"id":6871,"date":"2025-06-06T11:54:12","date_gmt":"2025-06-06T11:54:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/?p=6871"},"modified":"2025-06-06T11:54:12","modified_gmt":"2025-06-06T11:54:12","slug":"revisiting-alice-v-cls-bank-a-landmark-patent-case-in-todays-ai-driven-world","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/2025\/06\/06\/revisiting-alice-v-cls-bank-a-landmark-patent-case-in-todays-ai-driven-world\/","title":{"rendered":"Revisiting Alice v. CLS Bank:  A Landmark Patent Case in Today\u2019s AI-Driven World"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/landmark-patent.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"760\" height=\"450\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-6872\" srcset=\"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/landmark-patent.png 760w, https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/landmark-patent-300x178.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 760px) 100vw, 760px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>The US Supreme Court&#8217;s 2014 decision in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International remains one of the most cited and influential decisions in the realm of software patents. It introduced the two-step test for determining patent eligibility under 35 U.S.C. \u00a7101, profoundly shaping how courts and the USPTO evaluate abstract ideas, particularly in software, business methods, and financial technologies.<\/p>\n<p>Fast forward to 2025, and this decade-old case is more relevant than ever. With the rise of generative AI, blockchain-based fintech systems, and complex software platforms driving every sector from healthcare to logistics, Alice continues to influence what types of innovations can\u2014and can\u2019t\u2014be patented.<\/p>\n<h2><strong>What Was the Alice Decision All About?<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>At its core, the Alice case involved software for a computerized escrow system that mitigated settlement risk. Alice Corp. held patents that claimed methods and systems for financial transaction settlement using a third-party intermediary.<\/p>\n<p>The Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the claims were not patent eligible because they were directed to an abstract idea\u2014namely, intermediated settlement\u2014and did not add anything significantly more to transform that idea into a patent-eligible invention.<\/p>\n<p>This gave rise to the now-famous Alice\/Mayo two-step test:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Is the claim directed to a patent-ineligible concept (like an abstract idea, law of nature, or natural phenomenon)?<\/li>\n<li>If so, do the claim elements\u2014individually or as an ordered combination\u2014contain an &#8216;inventive concept&#8217; sufficient to transform the nature of the claim?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>This test has become the primary gatekeeper for software and business method patents in the U.S.<\/p>\n<h2><strong>Why Does Alice Still Matter in 2025?<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/alice.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"697\" height=\"287\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-6873\" srcset=\"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/alice.png 697w, https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/alice-300x124.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 697px) 100vw, 697px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>In today\u2019s digital-first economy, Alice is more than a software patent case\u2014it\u2019s a benchmark for how well patent law adapts to disruptive technologies.<\/p>\n<p>Let\u2019s look at a few modern developments where Alice continues to cast a long shadow:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>\n<h2><strong> AI and Machine Learning<\/strong><\/h2>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Many modern AI innovations involve algorithms for analyzing data, generating content, or making predictions. But from a patent eligibility standpoint, they often resemble the abstract ideas that Alice targeted.<\/p>\n<p>For instance, in 2023, the USPTO rejected several AI patent applications involving fraud detection and user behavior modeling, citing Alice grounds. While the underlying technology might be cutting-edge, courts still require applicants to show how their invention improves the functioning of the computer or involves a novel technical implementation\u2014not just a new use of an algorithm.<\/p>\n<ol start=\"2\">\n<li>\n<h2><strong> Fintech and Blockchain<\/strong><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/fintech.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"697\" height=\"287\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-6874\" srcset=\"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/fintech.png 697w, https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/fintech-300x124.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 697px) 100vw, 697px\" \/><\/h2>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>2. The fintech space, where software handles high-speed trading, smart contracts, and decentralized finance (DeFi), is facing constant \u00a7101 scrutiny.<\/p>\n<p>In many ways, Alice began as a fintech case\u2014and it still controls this area. While blockchain payment systems and smart contracts seem revolutionary in business, courts still view them through Alice\u2019s cautious lens.<\/p>\n<p>In 2024, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the invalidation of a blockchain-related patent in the case Rady v. Boston Consulting Group, LLC. The patent in question, U.S. Patent No. 10,469,250, titled &#8220;System and Method for Authenticating Gemstones Using Blockchain Technology,&#8221; was deemed ineligible under 35 U.S.C. \u00a7 101. The court applied the two-step framework established in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International, concluding that the patent claims were directed to an abstract idea and lacked an inventive concept sufficient to transform the abstract idea into a patent-eligible application. Specifically, the court noted that recording unique gemstone data onto a blockchain did not improve the functionality of storing or processing data and merely implemented conventional analysis components with existing blockchain technology.<\/p>\n<p>This decision underscores the judiciary&#8217;s cautious approach to granting patents that implement traditional concepts using blockchain technology without demonstrating a specific technological improvement.<\/p>\n<p>This mirrors Alice\u2019s reasoning and illustrates its continued influence, showing how its precedent limits patentability even in tech that didn\u2019t exist in 2014.<\/p>\n<h2><strong>Connecting Alice to Patent Strategy Today<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/patent-strategy.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"697\" height=\"287\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-6875\" srcset=\"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/patent-strategy.png 697w, https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/patent-strategy-300x124.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 697px) 100vw, 697px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Understanding Alice is crucial for anyone filing a software or AI-related patent today. Here&#8217;s how its legacy plays out in modern patent strategy:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Provide detailed technical disclosures:<\/strong> Vague or high-level functional descriptions are unlikely to pass the <em>Alice<\/em> Patent applications must clearly articulate how the invention enhances a specific computing process or solves a concrete technical problem<\/li>\n<li><strong>Emphasize the \u201chow,\u201d not just the \u201cwhat.\u201d:<\/strong> Claim language should highlight the novel mechanisms or processes behind the innovation, not merely its outcomes. In AI-related filings, this could include innovative training methods, data processing pipelines, or hardware-level optimizations<\/li>\n<li><strong>Adopt a hybrid IP strategy:<\/strong> Consider combining multiple forms of protection\u2014such as patents for core technical infrastructure, trade secrets for proprietary models and datasets, and copyrights or design patents for user interfaces. This layered approach helps maximize IP coverage while aligning each asset with the most effective protection mechanism<br \/>\n<strong style=\"font-size: 32px;\"><br \/>\nConclusion: Alice\u2019s Echo in the AI Era<\/strong>It\u2019s been over a decade since Alice v. CLS Bank was decided, yet its principles dominate U.S. software patent law to this day. The case helped eliminate overly broad and vague patents but also created uncertainty for emerging technologies.<\/p>\n<p>In 2025, as AI reshapes industries and software becomes the bedrock of innovation, the tension between patent eligibility and abstract ideas is more pronounced than ever. Courts, regulators, and innovators must continue to walk the fine line between protecting genuine innovation and preventing monopolies on fundamental concepts.<\/p>\n<p>Whether reform is around the corner or not, the best patent strategies in today\u2019s world begin with understanding Alice\u2014not as history, but as a living doctrine shaping the future of technology protection.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The US Supreme Court&#8217;s 2014 decision in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International remains one of the most cited and influential decisions in the realm of software patents. It introduced the two-step test for determining patent eligibility under 35 U.S.C. \u00a7101, profoundly shaping how courts and the USPTO evaluate abstract [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":6872,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"rop_custom_images_group":[],"rop_custom_messages_group":[],"rop_publish_now":"initial","rop_publish_now_accounts":[],"rop_publish_now_history":[],"rop_publish_now_status":"pending","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[8,289],"class_list":["post-6871","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-ai","tag-patentcase"],"aioseo_notices":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Revisiting Alice v. CLS Bank: A Landmark Patent Case in Today\u2019s AI-Driven World - Patent Insights | DexPatent<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/2025\/06\/06\/revisiting-alice-v-cls-bank-a-landmark-patent-case-in-todays-ai-driven-world\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Revisiting Alice v. CLS Bank: A Landmark Patent Case in Today\u2019s AI-Driven World - Patent Insights | DexPatent\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The US Supreme Court&#8217;s 2014 decision in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International remains one of the most cited and influential decisions in the realm of software patents. It introduced the two-step test for determining patent eligibility under 35 U.S.C. \u00a7101, profoundly shaping how courts and the USPTO evaluate abstract [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/2025\/06\/06\/revisiting-alice-v-cls-bank-a-landmark-patent-case-in-todays-ai-driven-world\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Patent Insights | DexPatent\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-06T11:54:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/landmark-patent.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"760\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"450\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Linda Raj\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Linda Raj\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/06\\\/revisiting-alice-v-cls-bank-a-landmark-patent-case-in-todays-ai-driven-world\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/06\\\/revisiting-alice-v-cls-bank-a-landmark-patent-case-in-todays-ai-driven-world\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Linda Raj\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/5beb3a2bbcb43ffb10f5ded5914d163a\"},\"headline\":\"Revisiting Alice v. CLS Bank: A Landmark Patent Case in Today\u2019s AI-Driven World\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-06-06T11:54:12+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/06\\\/revisiting-alice-v-cls-bank-a-landmark-patent-case-in-todays-ai-driven-world\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":914,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/06\\\/revisiting-alice-v-cls-bank-a-landmark-patent-case-in-todays-ai-driven-world\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/landmark-patent.png\",\"keywords\":[\"#AI\",\"#patentcase\"],\"articleSection\":[\"DexPatent Blogs\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/06\\\/revisiting-alice-v-cls-bank-a-landmark-patent-case-in-todays-ai-driven-world\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/06\\\/revisiting-alice-v-cls-bank-a-landmark-patent-case-in-todays-ai-driven-world\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/06\\\/revisiting-alice-v-cls-bank-a-landmark-patent-case-in-todays-ai-driven-world\\\/\",\"name\":\"Revisiting Alice v. CLS Bank: A Landmark Patent Case in Today\u2019s AI-Driven World - Patent Insights | DexPatent\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/06\\\/revisiting-alice-v-cls-bank-a-landmark-patent-case-in-todays-ai-driven-world\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/06\\\/revisiting-alice-v-cls-bank-a-landmark-patent-case-in-todays-ai-driven-world\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/landmark-patent.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-06-06T11:54:12+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/5beb3a2bbcb43ffb10f5ded5914d163a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/06\\\/revisiting-alice-v-cls-bank-a-landmark-patent-case-in-todays-ai-driven-world\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/06\\\/revisiting-alice-v-cls-bank-a-landmark-patent-case-in-todays-ai-driven-world\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/06\\\/revisiting-alice-v-cls-bank-a-landmark-patent-case-in-todays-ai-driven-world\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/landmark-patent.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/landmark-patent.png\",\"width\":760,\"height\":450},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/2025\\\/06\\\/06\\\/revisiting-alice-v-cls-bank-a-landmark-patent-case-in-todays-ai-driven-world\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Revisiting Alice v. CLS Bank: A Landmark Patent Case in Today\u2019s AI-Driven World\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/\",\"name\":\"Patent Insights | DexPatent\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/5beb3a2bbcb43ffb10f5ded5914d163a\",\"name\":\"Linda Raj\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9cd9ca7f0f5221039773e717deef1874b3e34453923db6a7bb9bbf2c806c8844?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9cd9ca7f0f5221039773e717deef1874b3e34453923db6a7bb9bbf2c806c8844?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9cd9ca7f0f5221039773e717deef1874b3e34453923db6a7bb9bbf2c806c8844?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Linda Raj\"},\"description\":\"Linda, Lead Patent Scientist at DexPatent, is dedicated to aiding IP Counsel and Patent attorneys in Patent research and management. Her interests span from reading books to writing on subjects related to innovation, work, and life.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/author\\\/admin\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Revisiting Alice v. CLS Bank: A Landmark Patent Case in Today\u2019s AI-Driven World - Patent Insights | DexPatent","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/2025\/06\/06\/revisiting-alice-v-cls-bank-a-landmark-patent-case-in-todays-ai-driven-world\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Revisiting Alice v. CLS Bank: A Landmark Patent Case in Today\u2019s AI-Driven World - Patent Insights | DexPatent","og_description":"The US Supreme Court&#8217;s 2014 decision in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International remains one of the most cited and influential decisions in the realm of software patents. It introduced the two-step test for determining patent eligibility under 35 U.S.C. \u00a7101, profoundly shaping how courts and the USPTO evaluate abstract [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/2025\/06\/06\/revisiting-alice-v-cls-bank-a-landmark-patent-case-in-todays-ai-driven-world\/","og_site_name":"Patent Insights | DexPatent","article_published_time":"2025-06-06T11:54:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":760,"height":450,"url":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/landmark-patent.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Linda Raj","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Linda Raj","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/2025\/06\/06\/revisiting-alice-v-cls-bank-a-landmark-patent-case-in-todays-ai-driven-world\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/2025\/06\/06\/revisiting-alice-v-cls-bank-a-landmark-patent-case-in-todays-ai-driven-world\/"},"author":{"name":"Linda Raj","@id":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/5beb3a2bbcb43ffb10f5ded5914d163a"},"headline":"Revisiting Alice v. CLS Bank: A Landmark Patent Case in Today\u2019s AI-Driven World","datePublished":"2025-06-06T11:54:12+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/2025\/06\/06\/revisiting-alice-v-cls-bank-a-landmark-patent-case-in-todays-ai-driven-world\/"},"wordCount":914,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/2025\/06\/06\/revisiting-alice-v-cls-bank-a-landmark-patent-case-in-todays-ai-driven-world\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/landmark-patent.png","keywords":["#AI","#patentcase"],"articleSection":["DexPatent Blogs"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/2025\/06\/06\/revisiting-alice-v-cls-bank-a-landmark-patent-case-in-todays-ai-driven-world\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/2025\/06\/06\/revisiting-alice-v-cls-bank-a-landmark-patent-case-in-todays-ai-driven-world\/","url":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/2025\/06\/06\/revisiting-alice-v-cls-bank-a-landmark-patent-case-in-todays-ai-driven-world\/","name":"Revisiting Alice v. CLS Bank: A Landmark Patent Case in Today\u2019s AI-Driven World - Patent Insights | DexPatent","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/2025\/06\/06\/revisiting-alice-v-cls-bank-a-landmark-patent-case-in-todays-ai-driven-world\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/2025\/06\/06\/revisiting-alice-v-cls-bank-a-landmark-patent-case-in-todays-ai-driven-world\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/landmark-patent.png","datePublished":"2025-06-06T11:54:12+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/5beb3a2bbcb43ffb10f5ded5914d163a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/2025\/06\/06\/revisiting-alice-v-cls-bank-a-landmark-patent-case-in-todays-ai-driven-world\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/2025\/06\/06\/revisiting-alice-v-cls-bank-a-landmark-patent-case-in-todays-ai-driven-world\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/2025\/06\/06\/revisiting-alice-v-cls-bank-a-landmark-patent-case-in-todays-ai-driven-world\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/landmark-patent.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/landmark-patent.png","width":760,"height":450},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/2025\/06\/06\/revisiting-alice-v-cls-bank-a-landmark-patent-case-in-todays-ai-driven-world\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Revisiting Alice v. CLS Bank: A Landmark Patent Case in Today\u2019s AI-Driven World"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/#website","url":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/","name":"Patent Insights | DexPatent","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/5beb3a2bbcb43ffb10f5ded5914d163a","name":"Linda Raj","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9cd9ca7f0f5221039773e717deef1874b3e34453923db6a7bb9bbf2c806c8844?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9cd9ca7f0f5221039773e717deef1874b3e34453923db6a7bb9bbf2c806c8844?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9cd9ca7f0f5221039773e717deef1874b3e34453923db6a7bb9bbf2c806c8844?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Linda Raj"},"description":"Linda, Lead Patent Scientist at DexPatent, is dedicated to aiding IP Counsel and Patent attorneys in Patent research and management. Her interests span from reading books to writing on subjects related to innovation, work, and life.","sameAs":["https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights"],"url":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6871","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6871"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6871\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6876,"href":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6871\/revisions\/6876"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6872"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6871"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6871"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6871"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}