{"id":233,"date":"2017-01-10T09:38:00","date_gmt":"2017-01-10T09:38:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/?p=233"},"modified":"2024-02-26T07:38:56","modified_gmt":"2024-02-26T07:38:56","slug":"review-motorola-vs-microsoft-september-2013","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/2017\/01\/10\/review-motorola-vs-microsoft-september-2013\/","title":{"rendered":"Microsoft wins RAND case against Motorola for SEPs breach."},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/Microsoft-wins-RAND-case-against-Motorola-for-SEPs-breach.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"836\" height=\"554\" class=\"aligncenter\" \/><\/p>\n<h3><strong>Abusing Patent Rights \u2013 A Landmark Case of Microsoft &amp; Motorola<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>Federal court ordered recently Google owned Motorola to pay the software giant Microsoft $14.5 Million in a <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.dexpatent.com\" title=\"Patent Portfolio Due Diligence\">patent<\/a><\/strong> case relating to licensing of \u201cstandard-essential\u201d patents (SEPs).<br \/>\nThe claimed inventions of standard-essential patents must be used to comply with a technical standard. These standards are created by Standard Setting Organizations (SSOs) for use in designing and manufacturing technology products. The SSO often requires SEP owners to disclose and grant licenses to their patents and pending patent applications on RAND (Reasonable and NonDiscriminatory (&#8220;RAND&#8221;) rate.<\/p>\n<p>Issue in this case involves two standards which incorporate patented technology (i.e.) An IEEE wireless local area network (&#8220;WLAN&#8221;) standard called the &#8220;802J1 Standard&#8221; and an ITU2 advanced video coding technology standard called the &#8220;H.264 Standard.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Motorola owns patents that are essential to the 802.11 and H.264 Standards and has committed to license them on RAND terms. <a href=\"http:\/\/essentialpatentblog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/2013.04.25-D.E.-681-Findings-of-Fact-and-Conclusions-of-Law-setting-RAND-royalty1.pdf\">(<em>District court order \u2013 Finding of fact and conclusions of law<\/em><\/a>)<\/p>\n<p>Microsoft sued Motorola in November 2010 in the court as Motorola did not license patents to Microsoft at a reasonable and non-discriminatory (&#8220;RAND&#8221;) rate. The rate was 2.25 percent of the sale price of each Xbox and copy of Windows Microsoft sold. This will constitute a very high amount.<\/p>\n<p>Microsoft\u2019s Xbox is a special purpose computer which can be used to load and play video games. Xbox uses following 11 patents covering five technological area according to Motorola. <a href=\"http:\/\/essentialpatentblog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/2013.04.25-D.E.-681-Findings-of-Fact-and-Conclusions-of-Law-setting-RAND-royalty1.pdf\">(<em>District court<\/em><\/a><em> <a href=\"http:\/\/essentialpatentblog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/2013.04.25-D.E.-681-Findings-of-Fact-and-Conclusions-of-Law-setting-RAND-royalty1.pdf\">order \u2013 Finding of fact and conclusions of law<\/a><\/em>)<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-493 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/19.jpg\" width=\"1036\" height=\"267\" srcset=\"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/19.jpg 1036w, https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/19-300x77.jpg 300w, https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/19-1024x264.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/19-768x198.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1036px) 100vw, 1036px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Motorola also brought an injunction against certain Microsoft products in Germany as Microsoft refuses to pay the licensing fee demanded by Motorola. Microsoft moved a warehouse from Germany to the Netherlands costing about $23 million to avoid business related issues in case of Motorola wins the battle to ban Xbox in Germany.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;This is a landmark win for all who want products that are affordable and work well together,&#8221; said <strong>David Howard, Microsoft deputy general counsel<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We&#8217;re disappointed in this outcome, but look forward to an appeal of the new legal issues raised in the case,&#8221; said <strong>William Moss at Motorola<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>The court ruling in Microsoft and Motorola case have significant importance as it will prevent charging high royalty amounts towards licensing by <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/\" title=\"Patent Licensing Support Services\">patent<\/a><\/strong> owners and allows \u201cfair, reasonable and nondiscriminatory\u201d (FRAND) rates towards licensing of patents that are considered \u201cstandard-essential.\u201d This will facilitate software developers and phone manufacturers to develop high end products in the smart phone market.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>References:<\/strong><\/h3>\n<div style=\"font-size: 11pt; line-height: 12px;\">\n<p>1.<a href=\"http:\/\/essentialpatentblog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/2013.04.25-D.E.-681-Findings-of-Fact-and-Conclusions-of-Law-setting-RAND-royalty1.pdf\">District court order \u2013 Finding of fact and conclusions of<\/a><\/p>\n<p>2.<a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Essential_patent\">law-Essential patent &#8211; Wikipedia<\/a><\/p>\n<p>3.<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2013\/09\/05\/technology\/microsoft-wins-jury-ruling-in-motorola-patent-case.html?_r=2&amp;\">Microsoft wins Jury ruling in Motorola patent case &#8211; reuters-Microsoft<\/a><\/p>\n<p>4.<a href=\"http:\/\/www.sci-tech-today.com\/news\/Microsoft-Wins-Motorola-Patent-Case\/story.xhtml?story_id=0200028EL0VO\">Wins Patent Case Against Motorola -Sci-tech today.com<\/a><\/p>\n<p>5.<a href=\"https:\/\/techcrunch.com\/2013\/09\/04\/motorola-versus-microsoft\/\">Federal Jury Orders Motorola Mobility To Pay Microsoft $14.5 Million In Patent Case &#8211; <\/a><\/p>\n<p>6.<a href=\"http:\/\/www.waratahweb.com.au\/blog-1\/microsoft-notches-up-patent-victory-against-google\">Microsoft notches up patent victory against Google &#8211; waratahweb.com<\/a><\/p>\n<p>7.<a href=\"http:\/\/www.waratahweb.com.au\/blog-1\/microsoft-notches-up-patent-victory-against-google\">Microsoft sues Motorola, again &#8211; latimes.com<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>Subathra, Patent Scientist @ <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dexpatent.com\/\"><em>DexPatent<\/em><\/a> <a href=\"mailto:info@dexpatent.com\">(<em>info@dexpatent.com<\/em><\/a>)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The federal court has ruled in favor of Microsoft in a patent dispute case with Motorola relating to licensing of \u201cstandard-essential\u201d patents (SEPs) <a class=\"moretag\" href=\"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/2017\/01\/10\/review-motorola-vs-microsoft-september-2013\/\">Read More<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":5123,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"rop_custom_images_group":[],"rop_custom_messages_group":[],"rop_publish_now":"initial","rop_publish_now_accounts":[],"rop_publish_now_history":[],"rop_publish_now_status":"pending","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-233","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-technology-insights"],"aioseo_notices":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Microsoft wins RAND case against Motorola for SEPs breach. - Patent Insights | DexPatent<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Microsoft sued Motorola in November 2010 in the court as Motorola did not license patents to Microsoft at a reasonable and non-discriminatory (&quot;RAND&quot;) rate.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/2017\/01\/10\/review-motorola-vs-microsoft-september-2013\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Microsoft wins RAND case against Motorola for SEPs breach. - Patent Insights | DexPatent\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Microsoft sued Motorola in November 2010 in the court as Motorola did not license patents to Microsoft at a reasonable and non-discriminatory (&quot;RAND&quot;) rate.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/2017\/01\/10\/review-motorola-vs-microsoft-september-2013\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Patent Insights | DexPatent\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-01-10T09:38:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-02-26T07:38:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/Microsoft-wins-RAND-case-against-Motorola-for-SEPs-breach.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"679\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"450\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"DexPatent\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"DexPatent\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/2017\\\/01\\\/10\\\/review-motorola-vs-microsoft-september-2013\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/2017\\\/01\\\/10\\\/review-motorola-vs-microsoft-september-2013\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"DexPatent\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cb9ad295f1f8542527d608ab5d9e8545\"},\"headline\":\"Microsoft wins RAND case against Motorola for SEPs breach.\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-01-10T09:38:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-02-26T07:38:56+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/2017\\\/01\\\/10\\\/review-motorola-vs-microsoft-september-2013\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":482,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/2017\\\/01\\\/10\\\/review-motorola-vs-microsoft-september-2013\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/01\\\/Microsoft-wins-RAND-case-against-Motorola-for-SEPs-breach.png\",\"articleSection\":[\"Technology Insights\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/2017\\\/01\\\/10\\\/review-motorola-vs-microsoft-september-2013\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/2017\\\/01\\\/10\\\/review-motorola-vs-microsoft-september-2013\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/2017\\\/01\\\/10\\\/review-motorola-vs-microsoft-september-2013\\\/\",\"name\":\"Microsoft wins RAND case against Motorola for SEPs breach. - Patent Insights | DexPatent\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/2017\\\/01\\\/10\\\/review-motorola-vs-microsoft-september-2013\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/2017\\\/01\\\/10\\\/review-motorola-vs-microsoft-september-2013\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/01\\\/Microsoft-wins-RAND-case-against-Motorola-for-SEPs-breach.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-01-10T09:38:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-02-26T07:38:56+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cb9ad295f1f8542527d608ab5d9e8545\"},\"description\":\"Microsoft sued Motorola in November 2010 in the court as Motorola did not license patents to Microsoft at a reasonable and non-discriminatory (\\\"RAND\\\") rate.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/2017\\\/01\\\/10\\\/review-motorola-vs-microsoft-september-2013\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/2017\\\/01\\\/10\\\/review-motorola-vs-microsoft-september-2013\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/2017\\\/01\\\/10\\\/review-motorola-vs-microsoft-september-2013\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/01\\\/Microsoft-wins-RAND-case-against-Motorola-for-SEPs-breach.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/01\\\/Microsoft-wins-RAND-case-against-Motorola-for-SEPs-breach.png\",\"width\":679,\"height\":450,\"caption\":\"RAND-case-against\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/2017\\\/01\\\/10\\\/review-motorola-vs-microsoft-september-2013\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Microsoft wins RAND case against Motorola for SEPs breach.\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/\",\"name\":\"Patent Insights | DexPatent\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cb9ad295f1f8542527d608ab5d9e8545\",\"name\":\"DexPatent\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"DexPatent\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/dexpatent.com\\\/insights\\\/author\\\/dexpatent\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Microsoft wins RAND case against Motorola for SEPs breach. - Patent Insights | DexPatent","description":"Microsoft sued Motorola in November 2010 in the court as Motorola did not license patents to Microsoft at a reasonable and non-discriminatory (\"RAND\") rate.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/2017\/01\/10\/review-motorola-vs-microsoft-september-2013\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Microsoft wins RAND case against Motorola for SEPs breach. - Patent Insights | DexPatent","og_description":"Microsoft sued Motorola in November 2010 in the court as Motorola did not license patents to Microsoft at a reasonable and non-discriminatory (\"RAND\") rate.","og_url":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/2017\/01\/10\/review-motorola-vs-microsoft-september-2013\/","og_site_name":"Patent Insights | DexPatent","article_published_time":"2017-01-10T09:38:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-02-26T07:38:56+00:00","og_image":[{"width":679,"height":450,"url":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/Microsoft-wins-RAND-case-against-Motorola-for-SEPs-breach.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"DexPatent","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"DexPatent","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/2017\/01\/10\/review-motorola-vs-microsoft-september-2013\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/2017\/01\/10\/review-motorola-vs-microsoft-september-2013\/"},"author":{"name":"DexPatent","@id":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/cb9ad295f1f8542527d608ab5d9e8545"},"headline":"Microsoft wins RAND case against Motorola for SEPs breach.","datePublished":"2017-01-10T09:38:00+00:00","dateModified":"2024-02-26T07:38:56+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/2017\/01\/10\/review-motorola-vs-microsoft-september-2013\/"},"wordCount":482,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/2017\/01\/10\/review-motorola-vs-microsoft-september-2013\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/Microsoft-wins-RAND-case-against-Motorola-for-SEPs-breach.png","articleSection":["Technology Insights"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/2017\/01\/10\/review-motorola-vs-microsoft-september-2013\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/2017\/01\/10\/review-motorola-vs-microsoft-september-2013\/","url":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/2017\/01\/10\/review-motorola-vs-microsoft-september-2013\/","name":"Microsoft wins RAND case against Motorola for SEPs breach. - Patent Insights | DexPatent","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/2017\/01\/10\/review-motorola-vs-microsoft-september-2013\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/2017\/01\/10\/review-motorola-vs-microsoft-september-2013\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/Microsoft-wins-RAND-case-against-Motorola-for-SEPs-breach.png","datePublished":"2017-01-10T09:38:00+00:00","dateModified":"2024-02-26T07:38:56+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/cb9ad295f1f8542527d608ab5d9e8545"},"description":"Microsoft sued Motorola in November 2010 in the court as Motorola did not license patents to Microsoft at a reasonable and non-discriminatory (\"RAND\") rate.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/2017\/01\/10\/review-motorola-vs-microsoft-september-2013\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/2017\/01\/10\/review-motorola-vs-microsoft-september-2013\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/2017\/01\/10\/review-motorola-vs-microsoft-september-2013\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/Microsoft-wins-RAND-case-against-Motorola-for-SEPs-breach.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/Microsoft-wins-RAND-case-against-Motorola-for-SEPs-breach.png","width":679,"height":450,"caption":"RAND-case-against"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/2017\/01\/10\/review-motorola-vs-microsoft-september-2013\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Microsoft wins RAND case against Motorola for SEPs breach."}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/#website","url":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/","name":"Patent Insights | DexPatent","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/cb9ad295f1f8542527d608ab5d9e8545","name":"DexPatent","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"DexPatent"},"url":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/author\/dexpatent\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/233","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=233"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/233\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6519,"href":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/233\/revisions\/6519"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5123"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=233"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=233"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=233"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}