{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Patent Insights | DexPatent","provider_url":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights","author_name":"Linda Raj","author_url":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/author\/admin\/","title":"Can Your Design Patent Survive an Obviousness Challenge? Understanding The Landmark LKQ vs. GM Ruling - Patent Insights | DexPatent","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"cMvAYBuwje\"><a href=\"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/2026\/11\/12\/lkq-v-gm-design-patent-obviousness-ruling\/\">Can Your Design Patent Survive an Obviousness Challenge? Understanding The Landmark LKQ vs. GM Ruling<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/2026\/11\/12\/lkq-v-gm-design-patent-obviousness-ruling\/embed\/#?secret=cMvAYBuwje\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;Can Your Design Patent Survive an Obviousness Challenge? Understanding The Landmark LKQ vs. GM Ruling&#8221; &#8212; Patent Insights | DexPatent\" data-secret=\"cMvAYBuwje\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/dexpatent.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/Design-Patent-Survive.png","thumbnail_width":760,"thumbnail_height":450,"description":"Can a design patent be invalidated simply because its ornamental features can be found across multiple earlier designs? A landmark 2024 ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has significantly changed how this question is answered. In the United States, design patents protect the ornamental appearance [&hellip;]"}